Eight Ounces of Serious Seven Shot Protection

Tough morning. Our son, daughter-in-law and youngest granddaughter headed back to Texas after a two week stay. Great family time and lots of “Argh!” prefaced pirate imitations… which always concluded with the observation, “Grandpa’s silly”. Which is a good observation because, if nothing else, I am pretty silly.

 
The best place to begin describing the KEL-Tec P32 is the way it is packaged for the consumer; a proportionally sized and lockable hard case, a molded to fit gun lock with mini spanner wrench and a very complete and well illustrated manual. The overall packaging of the firearm left me with the impression the company is proud of their products and respects the customers. The P-32 is an inexpensive gun, but it is not a cheaply made gun and it piqued my interest… and, if you’ve ever had your curiosity piqued, you know that can be a pretty irritating experience. No, I have no idea what we are talking about now. Then stop it. No, YOU stop it.
 
 
Relativity…
 
 
Compared to a 5″ Model 1911, far left, the P-32, far right, is tiny. Compared to a very compact SIG P239 monkey in the middle, the P-32 is still tiny. Interesting as both the SIG and KEL-Tec are billed as being very small and easy to conceal backup guns. Discounting the SIG’s power of the .357 SIG cartridge, KEL-Tec probably makes a more compelling case as a highly concealable backup gun.
 
 

Manufacturer

KEL-TEC Actual
Model P32
Origin USA
Type Semi Auto DA
Caliber .32 ACP
Capacity 7+1

Construction

Barrel/Slide 4041 Steel
Internal Frame 7075-T6 Alum.
Grip Frame ST8018 Poly
Finish Matte Blue

Weights & Measures

Overall length 5.10″ 5.00″
Height 3.50″ 3.50″
Grip Width 0.75″ 0.75″
Sight Radius 3.80″ 3.96″
Barrel Length 2.70″ 2.70″
Weight – Empty 6.6 oz. 8.0 oz.

Price

MSRP $318
Typical

$250

Little gun philosophical differences

The P-32 utilizes steel for pressure stressed area assemblies, aluminum as the portion of the frame that gets banged around under recoil and poly for a grip to hold the aluminum frame and to give the shooter a place to hang on. It is a very well made gun, nice design touches. As a point of small gun comparison, I don’t believe the KEL-TEC rises to the quality of a Ruger LCP in terms of fit and finish but, again, the KEL-TEC is by no means a gun lacking in quality of materials or workmanship. The KEL-TEC has a purposeful utility appearance where the Ruger LCP looks a bit more finessed.

Strength can be a byproduct of finessed aesthetic design. Ruger molds radial ribs integral to the forward part of the grip frame and uses sweeping compound curves and pin support bosses to add rigidity to the grip frame. There is a caution in the KEL-TEC manual that indicates finger pressure should be applied to the grip frame on either side of the take down pin while it is being extracted to prevent the grip frame from distorting and causing the detent spring to pull out of place.
 
The Ruger LCP does not lock open on empty, while the KEL-TEC P-32 does. The Ruger has a slide hold open feature as a shooting and disassembly convenience which may be Rugers solution to the problem of very small autoloaders being sensitive to variations in ammunition and not always reliably locking open on empty. With the right ammo, the P-32 KEL-TEC locks open consistently, making reloading and getting to a full chamber easy.
 
 
The Ruger slide, top, is a bit more beefy than the KEL-TEC; providing additional guidance to the hammer and along the slide’s sides. The Ruger utilizes a pivoting extractor, the KEL-TEC a flat spring extractor. Both guns use camming and barrel breech block lock up. Both guns are single strike double action only. The KEL-TEC trigger pull measured 7 lbs 8 oz which is pretty typical for this type of firearm. The KEL-TEC P-32 has a good heft, despite it’s light weight. It feels comfortable in hold and shoots where pointed without having to spend much time trying to find the little non-contrasting sights.
 
Easy take down…
Removal of the single take down pin gets the gun disassembled. There are few parts to maintain, the machine work is clean and the molded pieces are well formed and have minimal parting lines. The only odd item is the bare 4140, chrome moly, steel barrel. Not sure why it isn’t blued.

Performance in summary… Details follow

Of the three types of ammunition fired, MAGTECH, produced the highest level of velocity and cycled flawlessly firing one hundred rounds. At seven yards, emptying the gun into a 1″ – 1.5″ from a rest is routine. 3″, with not much more than a point at seven yards, is pretty incredible for a very small handgun. The KEL-TEC did not function reliably with specialty Extreme Shock ammunition, nor did it function reliably with low velocity PPU ammunition. Wet ballistic penetration was good, 8″ to 13″ depending upon the ammunition. Bullet expansion in any case was non-existent. While all of this may sound hyper critical, it is not, as explained within the details that follow.

I like the gun and purchased it for my personal use. I would trust it to continue functioning with any ammunition that initially proved reliable and I think there is plenty of pop for self defense as a backupgun even without bullet expansion. The KEL-TEC P-32 is well made and it is easy to shoot well.

Live fire… and expansive thinking

A word for context – Sub compact autoloaders are notorious for not cycling reliably. This is not a reflection of quality of production or design, but rather a reflection of the laws of physics. Because of the very low reciprocating mass of the small slide, there is a comparatively reduced level of slide inertia, which makes the balance of cartridge load levels and recoil spring selection much more critical than would be the case with a larger gun with greater slide mass. Consequently, the chances of a sub-compact gun cycling reliability with all ammo are slim to none.
 
These noted problems are remedied by selecting a type of ammo that is found to function reliably, and/or by juggling recoil springs until one combination allows the gun to function reliably with the ammo of choice. The P-32 factory recoil spring is rated at 9lbs. Wolff Springs offers both 11 lbs and 13 lbs replacements.
 
To isolate gun from ammo related issues, a compact FEG AP-MBP, pictured above, was fired in parallel with the sub-compact KEL-TEC.
 

KEL-TEC P-32

MFG

Type Grains  Act. Vel. Rated
PPU JHP 71 659 902
MAGTECH JHP 65 807 922
Extreme EPR 60 778 830

FEG MBP Model AP 7.65mm

PPU JHP 71 671 902
MAGTECH JHP 65 921 922
Extreme EPR 60 892 830

With the exception of the low performer Privi Partizan ammunition, the increase in barrel length from 2.7″ to 3.9″ was worth approximately 120 fps, which is of consequence.

The only bullet that expanded to any significant degree was the MAGTECH jacketed hollow point, but only when fired from the FEG with the longer 3.9″ barrel where velocity was greater. Expanding to 0.465″ is a substantial increase in bullet diameter and weight loss was trivial.  Jacketed handgun bullets are that way. If they can’t be pushed into the 900-1,000 fps range, the hole will be no greater than original bullet diameter. This is characteristic of all small gun/small caliber combinations and it would be unrealistic to think otherwise.

 
Extreme Shock ammo, a product of
Mullins Ammunition, is described by the manufacturer as a “Fragmentable explosive entry enhanced penetration round (EPR)”… Unfortunately, Extreme Shock bullets neither expanded or fragmented when fired from either firearm. Additionally, the Extreme Shock case expanded excessively in both guns.
 
Case diameter above the extractor groove measured 0.330″ on fresh cartridges and 0.344″ when fired, leaving the impression that the guns were unlocking prematurely and the case was seeing pressure with less than full support. The other brands of ammunition uniformly case expanded to 0.333″ with no similar symptoms.
 

I liked the PPU ammunition accuracy, but it chronographed as the lowest velocity and it would not cycle the P-32 reliably.  It did work well in the FEG and it did group at 1″ at seven yards from the same gun. At 34 cents per rounds, compared to $1.20 for the Extreme Shock ammo, I’m temped to finesse the KEL-TEC a little to make them work together. MAGTECH Guardian Gold runs about 66 cents per round.

Determining penetration… neatness counts

After years of mixing gelatin, buying expensive synthetic and petroleum based substitutes and getting, at best, mixed results, I have finally settled on a homebrew. Results are comparable to ballistic gelatin but without the cost and mess. In this case a 15″x12″x8″ poly container was filled with water saturated double wall corrugated, however, it could have been scales for larger cartridge evaluation. The only critical part was setting up is to assure the cardboard was fully saturated.

 
The container volume is approximately 0.83 cubic feet, which works out to approximately 51.6 lbs of fresh water. I filled the container with tightly packed, edge oriented cardboard sheets, then flooded the box and let the water soak in until the whole box weighed approximately 35 lbs. Anything of less density typically meant there were sections of dry cardboard and bullets would blow right through. This isn’t a magic number, it is a consistency number that allows me to set up for this test the same way each time and penetration readings taken are a relative apple to apple comparison. Until animals are made of gelatin and have no bones, the test is as realistic as ballistic gel.

 

KEL-TEC P-32

MFG

Type Grains Penetration Expansion
PPU JHP 71 8″ None
MAGTECH JHP 65 9.5 None
Extreme EPR 60 11.0″ None

FEG MBP Model AP 7.65mm

PPU JHP 71 10.5 None
MAGTECH JHP 65 12.0″ 0.460″
Extreme EPR 60 13.0 None
I don’t believe we will be shooting engine blocks out of tanks with the .32 ACP, but then, the P-32 is billed as a backup gun and is intended to serve concealment and last ditch protection.  Beats the heck out of a gun chambered for the .22 Long Rifle rim fire round and it is a close second the .380 ACP.
 
I was very impressed with how easy it is to shoot the P-32 accurately, the guns comfortable heft and its natural point. Yeah… I’m impressed.

Comments appearing below are posted by individuals in a free exchange, not associated with Real Guns. Therefore RGI Media takes no responsibility for information appearing in the comments section. Reader judgement is essential.

Email Notification

Leave a Comment